An analysis of B2B customer interactions over the past 5.5 years has revealed recurring data-related errors in Fintech development. These insights are crucial for developers, highlighting areas for improvement and underscoring the importance of accurate and reliable data as a competitive edge. Here are 10 Common Data-Related Mistakes in Fintech Development.
Quick jump:
- 1 The Illusion of Free Data
- 2 Untrustworthy Data: Eroding User Confidence
- 3 Limited Market Coverage: Stifling Growth Potential
- 4 Overlooking Licensing: Legal Risks and Complications
- 5 Choosing Outdated Providers: Hindered Agility and Innovation
- 6 Single Data Source Dependency: Risking Accuracy
- 7 Over-investing in Premium Data Providers
- 8 Inadequate Historical Data Coverage
- 9 Fragmented Data Sources: Increased Costs and Complexity
- 10 Ignoring API Rate Limits: Service Disruptions
The Illusion of Free Data
Issue: Developers often assume that free data sources are cost-effective, but hidden costs related to data quality issues can arise, consuming significant time for corrections and impeding development efficiency.
Case Study: A solo entrepreneur developing a stock screener spent up to 2 hours daily fixing data inconsistencies from a free data source, severely affecting progress.
Untrustworthy Data: Eroding User Confidence
Issue: Using unreliable data providers can lead to user dissatisfaction and mistrust, as users rely on accurate data for decision-making.
Case Study: A wealth management platform’s choice of a low-cost data provider resulted in security price discrepancies, causing 20% of users to leave due to diminished trust in the platform’s analytics.
Limited Market Coverage: Stifling Growth Potential
Issue: Startups with growth ambitions need data providers with extensive market coverage. Switching providers as the business expands is time-consuming and costly, impacting growth momentum.
Case Study: A European startup faced a 3-month delay in onboarding a new data provider to include Australian-traded securities, leading to user frustration and attrition.
Overlooking Licensing: Legal Risks and Complications
Issue: Failing to review and comply with data licensing terms can result in legal complications and operational disruptions.
Case Study: An investment app displayed delayed prices without the proper redistribution license, leading to a legal dispute and loss of support for those securities.
Choosing Outdated Providers: Hindered Agility and Innovation
Issue: Relying on outdated data providers can impede rapid iteration and innovation, which is essential for Fintech startups.
Case Study: A US-based asset management firm faced delays and high costs due to prolonged negotiations with a data provider about a new use case, ultimately switching to a more adaptable provider to meet their needs.
Single Data Source Dependency: Risking Accuracy
Issue: Relying on a single data source can lead to calculation errors and flawed investment decisions, jeopardizing the success of investment strategies.
Case Study: An asset management company experienced a $10,000 loss due to outdated security prices from a sole provider. They mitigated future risks by adding a secondary provider for data verification.
Over-investing in Premium Data Providers
Issue: Investing heavily in a top-tier data vendor from the outset can result in inefficient resource allocation, leaving inadequate funds for development and marketing.
Case Study: A startup sought to replace high-cost data feeds from a premium vendor to reallocate resources towards essential development and marketing.
Inadequate Historical Data Coverage
Issue: Neglecting the depth and coverage of historical data, including delisted tickers, can lead to errors in backtesting and flawed investment strategies.
Case Study: An investment firm improved backtesting accuracy by expanding data coverage to include comprehensive historical data and delisted securities.
Fragmented Data Sources: Increased Costs and Complexity
Issue: Using multiple providers for additional data feeds can lead to unnecessary expenses and inefficiencies. Often, expanding services with a current provider can be more cost-effective.
Case Study: A financial services company consolidated data services with their existing provider, reducing costs and simplifying data management after initially subscribing to multiple new providers.
Ignoring API Rate Limits: Service Disruptions
Issue: Not adhering to daily and per-minute API limits can result in unexpected failures during high-traffic periods.
Case Study: A fintech platform faced major disruptions and delays in data updates during a market surge due to exceeding API rate limits, which were later addressed by improving monitoring and management practices.
By understanding and addressing these common data challenges, Fintech developers can enhance the robustness and resilience of their platforms, contributing to long-term success.